Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) 2026 Annual Meeting

BA BRIEFING·
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) 2026 Annual Meeting
10 directors up · 8 in watch zone · 14 proposals · Uncontested
$4.7T mkt cap · 1Y TSR +126.4% · Board B+
Director Elections (10) · 9 of 10 scored by BA forecast
Election Outlook
Most directors look set to be re-elected without meaningful dissent — 1 of 9 scored nominees are rated Healthy. 8 are flagged for elevated vote pressure; the most-loaded are Larry Page (prior 80.9%, forecast Material), John L. Hennessy (prior 83.3%, forecast Material), and Frances H. Arnold (prior 90.0%, forecast Material), with 5 other(s) in the table below.
NomineeForecastBackground
Not independent
MATERIAL
Prior 80.9%
70808793100
Larry Page co-founded Google, served as CEO from 1998 to 2001 and from 2011 to 2015, and has been a director since 1998.
Not independent
HEALTHY
Prior 98.0%
70808793100
Sergey Brin co-founded Google and served as its President from 2001 to 2015 and as Alphabet's President from 2015 to 2019.
Not independent
ELEVATED
Prior 98.8%
70808793100
Sundar Pichai has been CEO of Google since 2015 and CEO of Alphabet since 2019, leading significant advancements in AI across the company's product portfolio.
Independent
MATERIAL
Prior 83.3%
70808793100
John L. Hennessy served as President of Stanford University from 2000 to 2016 and is a recipient of the ACM A.M. Turing Award.
Independent
MATERIAL
Prior 90.0%
70808793100
Frances H. Arnold is a Nobel Prize-winning chemist and serves as an independent director at Generate Biomedicines and Illumina, Inc.
Independent
ELEVATED
Prior 99.3%
70808793100
Former CFO and Chief Information Officer at Goldman Sachs, with executive roles from 2005 to 2019, and currently a Partner and Vice Chairman at Sixth Street.
Independent
L. John Doerr has been Chair of Kleiner Perkins since 2016 and served as General Partner since 1980, with notable public company directorships including DoorDash and Amyris.
Independent
ELEVATED
Prior 99.0%
70808793100
Roger W. Ferguson Jr. served as President and CEO of TIAA from 2008 to 2021 and was Vice Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve from 1999 to 2006.
Independent
ELEVATED
Prior 88.8%
70808793100
Independent
ELEVATED
Prior 88.6%
70808793100
Robin Washington served as CFO of Gilead Sciences from 2008 to 2019 and is currently President and CFO of Salesforce since March 2025.
Proposals on the Ballot (14)
#1
Election of Directors
Filed by the board · Board recommends For
Elect ten directors: Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Sundar Pichai, John L. Hennessy, Frances H. Arnold, R. Martin “Marty” Chávez, L. John Doerr, Roger W. Ferguson Jr., K. Ram Shriram, and Robin L. Washington.
#2
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Filed by the board · Board recommends For
Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Alphabet’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending .
#3
Approval of the Amendment and Restatement of Alphabet’s Amended and Restated 2021 Stock Plan
Filed by the board · Board recommends For
Approve an amendment and restatement of Alphabet’s Amended and Restated 2021 Stock Plan to increase the share reserve by 200,000,000 shares of Class C capital stock.
Detail ›
This management proposal requests shareholder approval to increase Alphabet’s Amended and Restated 2021 Stock Plan share reserve by 200 million Class C shares. Management and the Compensation Committee argue that equity awards are central to Alphabet’s talent attraction and retention strategy and that the current available share pool (approximately 534 million shares as of year-end 2025) will be insufficient to support expected hiring and compensation needs. The amendment is an expansion of an existing, shareholder-approved plan and does not change fundamental plan mechanics aside from increasing the authorized share count; it preserves existing governance controls such as committee administration, limits on non-employee director awards, repricing restrictions, and adjustment provisions for corporate transactions. The request is positioned in the context of Alphabet’s heavy reliance on equity-based compensation (GSUs and PSUs) as primary long-term incentives for executives and senior employees, tying pay to multi-year performance and retention. From a governance perspective, shareholders should evaluate dilution risk versus the operational need to maintain equity availability to fund strategic hires and incentive programs; the filing discloses current run-rate usage and that management believes the incremental issuance is necessary. The Board recommends approval, emphasizing the plan’s role in retaining top technical and managerial talent during a period of significant AI-driven investment and growth. Potential investor considerations include the incremental dilution to Class C economic interests (though Class C shares do not carry voting rights) and how the company’s share usage and equity grant practices will be monitored and disclosed going forward. Overall, the proposal asks shareholders to authorize a specific numeric increase to a long-standing equity plan to preserve Alphabet’s ability to grant competitive awards under existing plan terms.
#4
Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation Awarded to Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay
Filed by the board · Board recommends For
Advisory, non-binding vote to approve the compensation awarded to Alphabet’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
Detail ›
This management proposal seeks an advisory (non-binding) shareholder vote on the company’s named executive officer (NEO) compensation disclosures and program. Management frames its compensation approach around three pillars—attract/retain talent, support innovation and performance, and align pay with shareholder outcomes—using a pay mix heavily weighted to long-term equity (GSUs and PSUs) and multi-year performance metrics such as relative TSR. The Compensation Committee runs a triennial cadence for CEO awards and uses PSUs with relative TSR against the S&P 100, while other senior equity includes both GSUs and PSUs with multi-year vesting and performance conditions; management highlights safeguards such as multi-year vesting, clawback policies, prohibitions on hedging/pledging, and minimum share ownership requirements. The say-on-pay vote is advisory but informs the Compensation Committee’s future design choices; historically management cites shareholder feedback and say-on-pay outcomes in program adjustments. Investors should assess whether pay design credibly links realized compensation to long-term value creation given recent strong TSR and large PSU payouts in the 2023–2025 performance period, as well as the inclusion of Bet-linked performance units for Other Bets in recent CEO awards. The Board recommends FOR, emphasizing pay-for-performance alignment and retention during a growth phase driven by AI investment. Key considerations include the magnitude and structure of CEO/NEO awards, disclosure transparency on PSU metrics and outcomes, and how equity issuance interacts with dilution and capital allocation priorities. Because this is advisory, implementation is left to the Board and Compensation Committee; investors use the result as a governance signal to influence future compensation design.
#5
Shareholder Proposal Regarding an Enhanced Disclosure on Climate Goals
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request that Alphabet publish a report explaining how it will meet its GHG- and electricity-related climate commitments given rapidly growing AI/data center energy demand, including contingency plans, stress tests, pathways to 2030 and estimated carbon removal needed.
#6
Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on Water Usage and AI Development
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request that Alphabet prepare and disclose a report detailing how its water usage policies and practices align with its fiduciary duty to maximize long-term shareholder value, focusing on operational efficiency, cost management, and risk mitigation relevant to AI/data center operations.
#7
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Equal Shareholder Voting
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request that the Board take practicable steps to initiate and adopt a recapitalization plan to move to one vote per share (phase-out within seven years or other board-justified timeframe).
#8
Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Viewpoint Diversity Risk Report
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request that the Board establish an independent committee to publish a report assessing risks arising from an apparent lack of viewpoint diversity on the Board and within senior leadership and how those risks are mitigated.
#9
Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on Politicized Content Moderation
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request that Alphabet conduct an evaluation and issue a report analyzing risks and costs associated with using diagnostic tools created by politicized corporate partners (e.g., SPLC) and the legal, reputational, competitive risks of such partnerships.
#10
Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on Impact of U.S. Immigration Policy
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request a publicly available report on how U.S. immigration policy and enforcement impacts Alphabet’s operations, workforce, and ability to attract/retain AI talent.
#11
Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on Data Privacy
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request that the Board issue public reporting assessing operational, reputational, regulatory and legal risks from gaps in policies, controls and oversight of customer and user data processed through Google Services and Google Cloud, and recommend mitigations.
#12
Shareholder Proposal Regarding AI Board Oversight
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request that the Board update the Audit Committee charter to provide formal oversight on responsible development and deployment of AI and AI-related risks impacting human rights, including review and reporting to the full Board.
#13
Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on AI-Generated Misinformation
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request that the Board commission a third-party assessment and report on additional actions to mitigate false information produced by Google’s generative AI systems, including detection and removal approaches.
#14
Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on AI Data Usage Oversight
Filed by a shareholder · Board recommends Against
Request an annual report assessing risks to operations, finances, and public welfare from unethical or improper usage of external data in development, training, and deployment of Alphabet’s AI offerings, and steps taken to mitigate those risks.
Top institutional holders · as of Mar 31, 2026
Holder% of sharesPosition value
VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC3.12%$108.77B
STATE STREET CORP1.87%$65.06B
FMR LLC1.38%$48.16B
BlackRock, Inc.1.35%$46.86B
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC1.10%$38.30B
BlackRock, Inc.1.00%$34.69B
VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC0.80%$27.76B
PRICE T ROWE ASSOCIATES INC /MD/0.60%$20.75B
Capital World Investors0.54%$18.79B
Capital Research Global Investors0.47%$16.55B
Source: SEC 13F filings (latest quarter). Position value is the holder’s reported aggregate value at the as-of date.
Recent key filings
Quarterly report (10-Q)View ›
Definitive proxy (DEF 14A)View ›
Annual report (10-K)View ›
Quarterly report (10-Q)View ›
Quarterly report (10-Q)View ›
Definitive proxy (DEF 14A)View ›
About the risk forecast

The risk forecast scores each director on the company’s slate against Boardroom Alpha’s YoY Director-Vote Forecast model — three XGBoost classifiers that estimate the probability the director’s vote support falls below 70%, 80%, and 90% at the upcoming annual meeting, augmented by a five-rule governance escalation layer (overboarding, audit-committee composition, prior dissent, and others).

Bands map to those probability thresholds:

  • Crisis — high probability of vote support below 70%. Rare.
  • Material — high probability of below 80%. The primary screening threshold.
  • Elevated — significant elevated risk of dissent.
  • Watch — even a mild withhold is detectable. Informational.
  • Healthy — no signal of meaningful dissent.

Prior is the director’s most-recent vote-support percentage at this same board. Direction compares the forecast to that prior vote: ↑ expected better means more support than last year; ↓ expected worse means less.

Forecast applies only to non-contested annual proxies (DEF 14A). Contested situations are tracked separately on the contested-proxy pipeline. The model is retrained nightly; bands shown reflect the most recent run.

« Back to Shareholder Meeting Calendar

Get this in your inbox
Activism and governance research, in your inbox
Director nominee slates, proposals, settlement campaigns, and AGM outcomes from US public companies.

Frequently Asked Questions

When is the Alphabet Inc 2026 annual meeting?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) holds its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on June 5, 2026.
What is the record date for the Alphabet Inc 2026 meeting?
The record date for the Alphabet Inc 2026 meeting is April 6, 2026. Shareholders of record on or before that date are eligible to vote.
Who are the director nominees for Alphabet Inc's 2026 meeting?
The board is presenting 10 director nominees at the Alphabet Inc 2026 meeting. The full slate appears in the 'Director Nominees' table on this page, with independence designations and a structured indexable summary.
What proposals will shareholders vote on at the Alphabet Inc 2026 meeting?
Shareholders will vote on 14 proposals at the Alphabet Inc 2026 meeting. The full list with proposed-by tags and management recommendations appears in the 'Proposals on the Ballot' section on this page.
Are any directors at risk at Alphabet Inc's 2026 annual meeting?
The Boardroom Alpha Director-Vote Forecast flags 8 of 9 scored nominees as facing elevated vote pressure at the Alphabet Inc 2026 meeting: Larry Page, Sundar Pichai, John L. Hennessy, Frances H. Arnold, R. Martin Chávez plus 3 other(s). The most-loaded nominee is Larry Page (forecast band: material). Prior support: 80.9%. See the 'Director Nominees' table for the per-director forecast bar and prior support.
Where do I find the original proxy filing?
The 'View proxy' link at the top of this page opens the original SEC DEF 14A (or amended) filing for the Alphabet Inc 2026 meeting in the Boardroom Alpha filing viewer.

Last updated: