| Nominee | Forecast | Background |
|---|---|---|
Not independent | HEALTHY Prior 99.9% 70808793100 | Aman Bhutani has served as CEO of GoDaddy since September 2019 and was previously President of the Brand Expedia Group from June 2015 to September 2019. |
Independent | ELEVATED Prior 97.5% 70808793100 | Herald Chen has extensive experience in public company leadership and strategic transactions, serving on the boards of both public and private technology companies since joining the Board of Directors in 2018. |
Independent | MATERIAL Prior 97.4% 70808793100 | Former Chief Marketing and Sales Officer at Intuit from 2012 to 2016, currently serves on the boards of Experian plc and Versapay Corporation. |
Independent | ELEVATED Prior 98.5% 70808793100 | Former CFO of Adobe, with prior roles at EMC, and current board member of Snowflake and Cisco Systems since 2018. |
Independent | HEALTHY Prior 99.9% 70808793100 | Brian Sharples serves as independent Board Chair and has extensive experience in technology and e-commerce, including navigating strategic transactions. |
Independent | WATCH Prior 99.8% 70808793100 | Smith served as chair of Splunk Inc. until its acquisition by Cisco Systems in March 2024 and was interim CEO from November 2021 to April 2022. |
Independent | MATERIAL Prior 98.0% 70808793100 | Former Senior Vice President at PayPal with extensive executive experience in fintech and financial services, including roles at American Express and CA Technologies. |
Independent | ELEVATED Prior 98.9% 70808793100 | Srinivas Tallapragada has held multiple senior roles at Salesforce since 2012, including President and Chief Engineering Officer, and served as a former director at Avalara, Inc. |
Independent | HEALTHY Prior 99.9% 70808793100 | Zarmi served on the Nominating and Governance Committee from January 2023 to June 2023. |
| #1 | Election of directors — Aman Bhutani, Herald Chen, Caroline Donahue, Mark Garrett, Brian Sharples, Graham Smith, Leah Sweet, Srini Tallapragada and Sigal Zarmi Filed by the board · Board recommends For Election of nine incumbent directors to serve one-year terms until the 2027 annual meeting. |
| #2 | Advisory, non-binding vote to approve named executive officer compensation Filed by the board · Board recommends For Advisory “say-on-pay” vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement. Detail ›This advisory proposal asks stockholders to approve, on a non-binding basis, the Company’s named executive officer compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement. Management is seeking an affirmative advisory vote to confirm stockholder support for the design and implementation of the executive pay program, which emphasizes pay-for-performance elements (short-term incentives tied to Bookings and NEBITDA and long-term PSUs tied to relative TSR vs. the Nasdaq Internet Index), high proportions of at-risk variable compensation, and governance features such as equity ownership guidelines and clawback policies. The vote is non-binding but serves as a key input to the Compensation Committee’s future decisions and stockholder engagement process; a negative result would likely prompt direct outreach and potential program changes. In context, the Company reported strong 2025 financial results (NEBITDA expansion, free cash flow generation and share repurchases) that management cites to justify compensation outcomes. Management discloses specific program design changes — for example the 2025 STIP reweighting to Bookings and NEBITDA — to align incentives with strategic priorities, and the LTIP’s use of rTSR aims to align long-term pay with stockholder returns. The Board recommends FOR the proposal, stating that the program is competitive, fair and aligns with stockholder interests, while preserving discretion for the Compensation Committee to adjust awards. For an analyst evaluating the merits, the proposal presents a standard say-on-pay review: the program has materially performance-based design and robust governance features, but investors will weigh realized payouts, relative TSR outcomes, and specific design choices (e.g., metric selection and payout curves) when assessing alignment and effectiveness. |
| #3 | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending Filed by the board · Board recommends For Ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026. |
| #4 | Approval of the GoDaddy Inc. Amended and Restated 2024 Omnibus Incentive Plan Filed by the board · Board recommends For Approve an amendment and restatement of the 2024 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the share reserve by 3,116,000 shares (no other material changes). Detail ›This management proposal seeks shareholder approval to amend and restate the Company’s 2024 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the share reserve by 3,116,000 shares to ensure adequate run‑rate capacity for equity grants over the next one to two years. Management frames the request as necessary to continue making competitive equity awards to attract and retain employees and to align employee and executive interests with stockholder value creation. The Board highlights that the requested increase is limited to share count (no other material plan changes), quantified the incremental dilution (~2.3% of fully-diluted shares as of ), and points to governance-oriented plan features such as no evergreen provision, no liberal share recycling, no dividends on unvested awards, no repricing without shareholder approval, and limits on non-employee director compensation. The filing discloses the Company’s three-year average burn rate (1.9%), outstanding awards, overhang and the rationale that the added shares are expected to cover anticipated grant needs for one to two years given market conditions. The Compensation Committee relied on independent consultant advice and considered historical usage, remaining reserve, and competitive practices in setting the requested amount. The Board recommends FOR the amendment to preserve flexibility for long-term incentive grants while emphasizing controls to limit dilution and protect shareholders; analysts should evaluate projected dilution, historic grant practices, and whether the requested reserve sufficiently balances talent retention needs and shareholder dilution. |
| Holder | % of shares | Position value |
|---|---|---|
| VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.60% | $722M |
| VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 6.02% | $658M |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 4.89% | $536M |
| STATE STREET CORP | 4.76% | $521M |
| AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC | 4.56% | $499M |
| MORGAN STANLEY | 3.25% | $356M |
| TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | 2.66% | $291M |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.52% | $275M |
| WCM INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | 2.50% | $271M |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 2.35% | $258M |
| Quarterly report (10-Q) | View › | |
| Definitive proxy (DEF 14A) | View › | |
| Annual report (10-K) | View › | |
| Quarterly report (10-Q) | View › | |
| Quarterly report (10-Q) | View › | |
| Definitive proxy (DEF 14A) | View › |
About the risk forecast
The risk forecast scores each director on the company’s slate against Boardroom Alpha’s YoY Director-Vote Forecast model — three XGBoost classifiers that estimate the probability the director’s vote support falls below 70%, 80%, and 90% at the upcoming annual meeting, augmented by a five-rule governance escalation layer (overboarding, audit-committee composition, prior dissent, and others).
Bands map to those probability thresholds:
- Crisis — high probability of vote support below 70%. Rare.
- Material — high probability of below 80%. The primary screening threshold.
- Elevated — significant elevated risk of dissent.
- Watch — even a mild withhold is detectable. Informational.
- Healthy — no signal of meaningful dissent.
Prior is the director’s most-recent vote-support percentage at this same board. Direction compares the forecast to that prior vote: ↑ expected better means more support than last year; ↓ expected worse means less.
Forecast applies only to non-contested annual proxies (DEF 14A). Contested situations are tracked separately on the contested-proxy pipeline. The model is retrained nightly; bands shown reflect the most recent run.
« Back to Shareholder Meeting Calendar
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated: