| Nominee | Forecast | Background |
|---|---|---|
Not independent | WATCH Prior 94.4% 70808793100 | Berkley, Jr. has served as President and COO since 2009 and held various executive roles at the Company since 2000, demonstrating extensive leadership within the organization. |
Independent | — | Maria Luisa Ferre has served as President and CEO of FRG, LLC since 2001 and has been a board member of Popular, Inc. since 2004. |
Independent | ELEVATED Prior 92.0% 70808793100 | Partner and Head of Family Advisory Services at BDT & MSD Partners, previously a Partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. |
Independent | HEALTHY Prior 99.4% 70808793100 | Former President and CEO of Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America, Inc. |
Andrew J. Carrier Not independent | — |
| #1 | Election of Directors Filed by the board · Board recommends For Elect five director nominees to serve until their successors are elected and qualified (terms varying: three nominees for three-year terms, one for a two-year term, and one for a one-year term). |
| #2 | Non-Binding Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay Filed by the board · Board recommends For Non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement. Detail ›This management proposal asks shareholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve the disclosed compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Management seeks this approval as a standard governance practice to obtain shareholder feedback on pay programs; the Board emphasizes that NEO compensation is heavily performance-based, with a large proportion of pay at-risk and tied to multi-year ROE and book value growth metrics, mandatory deferral of RSUs until separation, clawback provisions, and other governance features. The Compensation Committee and Board recommend a "FOR" vote, arguing that the plan aligns executive incentives with long-term shareholder value, uses negative discretion to avoid formulaic incentives that could encourage short-term risk-taking, and has robust clawback and ownership safeguards. Key context includes the company’s strong 2025 performance (21.2% ROE, record underwriting and investment income), recent stockholder outreach reflecting support for compensation design, and significant mandatory deferral and performance metrics tailored to the long-duration nature of insurance liabilities. Analysts should weigh the management defenses—emphasis on ROE and long-term LTIP and RSU structures—against shareholder concerns about pay quantum and potential governance effects; however, the company reports high say-on-pay support historically and robust shareholder engagement, which management cites as validation of its approach. |
| #3 | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Filed by the board · Board recommends For Ratify KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending . |
| Holder | % of shares | Position value |
|---|---|---|
| MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE CO LTD | 15.79% | $3.90B |
| VANGUARD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | 5.08% | $1.25B |
| VANGUARD PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT LLC | 3.96% | $978M |
| STATE STREET CORP | 3.87% | $955M |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 2.75% | $679M |
| GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | 1.95% | $486M |
| KAYNE ANDERSON RUDNICK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC | 1.77% | $436M |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 1.64% | $404M |
| MORGAN STANLEY | 1.45% | $359M |
| Invesco Ltd. | 1.22% | $301M |
| Quarterly report (10-Q) | View › | |
| Definitive proxy (DEF 14A) | View › | |
| Annual report (10-K) | View › | |
| Quarterly report (10-Q) | View › | |
| Quarterly report (10-Q) | View › | |
| Definitive proxy (DEF 14A) | View › |
About the risk forecast
The risk forecast scores each director on the company’s slate against Boardroom Alpha’s YoY Director-Vote Forecast model — three XGBoost classifiers that estimate the probability the director’s vote support falls below 70%, 80%, and 90% at the upcoming annual meeting, augmented by a five-rule governance escalation layer (overboarding, audit-committee composition, prior dissent, and others).
Bands map to those probability thresholds:
- Crisis — high probability of vote support below 70%. Rare.
- Material — high probability of below 80%. The primary screening threshold.
- Elevated — significant elevated risk of dissent.
- Watch — even a mild withhold is detectable. Informational.
- Healthy — no signal of meaningful dissent.
Prior is the director’s most-recent vote-support percentage at this same board. Direction compares the forecast to that prior vote: ↑ expected better means more support than last year; ↓ expected worse means less.
Forecast applies only to non-contested annual proxies (DEF 14A). Contested situations are tracked separately on the contested-proxy pipeline. The model is retrained nightly; bands shown reflect the most recent run.
« Back to Shareholder Meeting Calendar
Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated: